The Awful Truth about Screwball and Film Noir
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eccc/6eccce8d20ff1b37d1574259309dc69edf881ea4" alt=""
Then there's the nutty ensemble screwball, such as many of Preston Sturges' films. Recently, I was absolutely bowled over by a stunningly good film, I ? Huckabees. It's one of the few successful neo-screwballs of the last several years (artistically, at least--the box office has been meager so far, though it's only been in limited release). I'd classify it in the crazy ensemble screwball formula, but it's so much more original than that makes it sound. While there are romantic elements, the film is ultimately about philosophy, about the big questions of life and how we cope with the crises of modern life, yet rather than coming off as pretentious, the film somehow feels very relevant. Imagine: a firefighter who's reexamining his life post-9/11, played by Mark Wahlberg (in perhaps the film's most surprisingly impressive performance). Except you won't notice its profundity or its relevance because you'll be too busy laughing.
It's perhaps my favorite film of the year.
Lately I've been thinking how much more I like screwball comedy than film noir. I've been part of a movie discussion group, and this year we watched 10 or so examples of film noir, most recently Out of the Past. Because many of us had already seen them before, we tended not to watch the best, most famous noirs, but we still chose highly regarded and well-reviewed titles. As time went on, it became clear that they all tend to be pretty much the same, with crazy MacGuffin plots that keep your brain scrambled but never add up. Only a very few film noirs have ever really impressed me (Gilda, for example, or to some extent Laura), but I've had a better average finding great screwballs. Plus, great screwballs tend to be exhilarating and romantic; film noir tends to leave one in a cynicial mood.
Critic Jonathan Rosenbaum recently put it best:
"Is there any way to win?" asks Kathie Moffat (Jane Greer), archetypal doom-ridden noir heroine in Out of the Past (1947), addressing Jeff Bailey (Robert Mitchum), archetypal doom-ridden noir hero. He replies, "There's a way to lose more slowly." When it comes to politics in art, the mannerist noir style seems to be one of the most attractive ways of losing slowly. It makes doom more voluptuous and artful than success, makes a film's characters seem "half in love with easeful Death," as Keats put it. I often wonder if the fondness many leftists have for noir films stems from their being suckers for romantic fatalism -- defeatists who wouldn't know what to do with success if it hit them over the head.Out of the Past is sumptuously made, with excellent performances, exquisite cinematography and some of the sharpest one-liners in the genre (like, "Joe couldn't find a prayer in the Bible"), but after seeing it twice it still doesn't quite satisfy me the way it should.
Labels: Hitchcock, Jonathan Rosenbaum, Movie Reviews
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home